Surface Book vs. MacBook 13″ – fight! – ITavisen.no

That’s not quite that Microsoft’s first laptop is twice as fast.

Microsoft surfer on a wave of positive vibes in the past year after Sadya Nadella took over. He has made many correct grip.

See also: We have tested Land Book, Surface Pro 4 and Band 2.

Bold hardware
And not least after the press conference on 6 October where they showed off fete Land Book, Surface Pro 4 and promising new mobiles.

But even though Microsoft’s first laptop has good reviews, there is one thing the company has stated in relation the main competitor that does not match.

Far from twice as fast
Microsoft claims namely that Land Book is twice as fast as the MacBook Pro 13 “, it is a truth that case with modifications, for PCWorld Geek Bench 3-test shows that Apple machine is actually faster in multi-thread test:

• MacBook Pro 13 “(Core i5-5227 with Intel Iris 6100): 7022 Points
• Land Book (Core i5-6300U with specially designed Nvidia GeForce): 6765 points

Banks Apple graphics
is when GeForce chip in Microsoft machine can work with the CPU in another test, the drag from Apple as the only has a built Intel Iris Video Card:

• Land Book (Core i5 -6300U with specially designed Nvidia GeForce): 2,143 points
• MacBook Pro 13 “(Core i5-5227 with Intel Iris 6100): 1500 points

Of course much better graphics performance
Microsoft’s assertion is anyway not correct, then the cheapest Land Book-model lacks GeForce chip (and therefore performance improvements when it comes to graphics section) – it is exactly this model that costs the same as MacBook Pro 13 ($ 1,500 – 12,600 million).

In Tomb Raider, which PCWorld also tested, managed a Land Book with Nvidia graphics card (which costs from $ 1700 – 14,300 million) 74 frames per second against the MacBook’s its 23.6 fps.

Another thing Microsoft’s new expensive laptop with GeForce graphics are much faster than the MacBook Pro 13 “is encoding of one 4K file in Premiere Pro:

• Land Book: 1329 seconds
• MacBook Pro 13 “: 2217 seconds

Surface accustomed battery test
“Both manufacturers claim that the machines are able to play video in 12 hours. MacBook Pro 13 “has roughly a 10 percent larger battery,” explains PCWorld, who gave up after an eight-hour test.

Then we had Apple machine 19 percent battery with two hours left to go, while Surface Book reported that it was at 29 percent with two hours and 26 minutes again.

As PCWorld points out this is impressive considering that Microsoft’s machine has a touchscreen and a smaller battery. “Both machines deliver pretty good battery life, but none of them had managed to play HD file as long as they themselves claim,” is the conclusion.

As 9to5Mac points out, it had been exciting to test Surface Book Nvidia against a MacBook Pro 15 “. Apple’s laptop has a dedicated namely AMD -skjermkort.

Microsoft has nonetheless a good point: they have managed to cram into a dedicated video card a 13 “machine .

Sources:
9to5Mac
PCWorld