Shortly after Apple’s new iPhone 6S models were launched, discovered the website Chip Works that phones built on two different system checkers. A9 processor, the heart and brain of the smart phones, provided by both Samsung and TSMC and the two varieties are not exactly alike. Samsung Edition is namely produced with 14 nm process, thus physically smaller. It was immediately some uncertainty about the different pieces actually lead to differences in performance or battery life.
Read more: A phone – two processors
Now, one and a half week later, it has been completed more testing (via MacRumors).
According to data collected from various sources, primarily the users themselves, it is approximately uniform large distribution when it comes to the pieces that are in phones, and distribution is not related to the two iPhone 6S models.
The tests, done with various benchmark programs that are freely available, shows mostly that there is hardly any difference at all are talking about performance.
TSMC more effective?
It may seem like it, however, differences in battery performance. A user who has compared the life of two iPhone 6S Plus models with different pieces argue that TSMC variant held nearly two hours longer, which can be characterized as sensational.
Also several tests carried out by Chinese Users can indicate that the larger TSMC chips provide better battery life. It has also been reported that Samsung-based versions can be warmer in use.
It should be noted that all these tests are performed with static benchmark programs, and they do not necessarily reflect actual use .
The reports have nonetheless led to enough discussion that Apple itself has issued a statement (via ArsTechnica).
Read also: Apple: iPhone blew all previous records
The company writes that A9-pieces are designed to meet the highest standards and will provide excellent performance and battery life regardless of model, color or capacity. They point out that certain tests that stress the processor with continuous workload is misleading when it comes to really use. Apple’s own tests, even taking into account the different components, show variations within a maximum of two to three percent, the printer manufacturer.
No comments:
Post a Comment