Friday, October 14, 2016

The investigation of Martines (1) deaths resumes – VG

the Police in Nordre Buskerud reopens the investigation of a case from 2006, where a year-long died after having been admitted to the hospital with serious head injuries.

The report South-East police district in a press release Friday afternoon.

the Mother to Martine, Trine Lise Lie, says to VG that it is difficult to put words on the developments in the case:

I don’t really know what I’m thinking now. We are of course happy because we want justice. At the same time, we know that the case has been dismissed twice before, so we feel confident that we’ll get there before we are finished.

Failed to prove

Facsimile VG July 2008

Monday 4. september 2006, Martine, in a little over a year, admitted to the hospital with very serious head injuries. She should have been in nice shape when her parents entrusted her to the dagmammaen the day, but became ill and hospitalized.

Four days later she died at the national hospital.

In January, after the year was child’s dagmamma indicted in the case. The indictment went on the assault with the result in death under particularly aggravating circumstances.

In the press release from the police stated that “the further investigation showed that there was no doubt that the injuries had been inflicted by a person.”

the Police still managed not to prove when the damage had been inflicted. As a result of this the case was dismissed by the public prosecutor in Oslo in april 2008.

Henleggelsen was contested by the Martines parents, and the case was reopened by the attorney general and investigated further. Particularly central was the expert to the opinions about when the injury had been inflicted.

Also at the time told Martines parents to VG that they were happy that the matter was taken up again.

– It is totally unreal what has happened. When the child is torn away in this manner, it is a terrible experience. I should also so many times have wished that I had not delivered me the kid in the morning. Such thoughts make one in retrospect, the mother said at the time.

That the matter was taken up again the led still does not forward. The case was once again dismissed by the attorney general, one year after the first henleggelsen.

<p>PÅ HOSPITAL: Martine was 13  måmonths old when she was  admitted.</p>

AT the HOSPITAL: Martine was 13 months old when she was admitted.

Photo: Private, VG

Cold case-group

Now is the investigation once again reopened. It happens after the child’s parents in the last year made contact with the police in connection with the creation of the Section for serious and unsolved cases at Kripos, the so-called Cold Case group.

They took the case, and has now sent it to the police in Nordre Buskerud. Cold Case-the group proposes, according to the police themselves, further etterforskningskritt that could elucidate the matter further.

in the Summer of 2016, the police in Nordre Buskerud, with very good assistance from Cold Case, the extrajudicial investigation in the case. This investigation has resulted in that the case is reopened by the attorney general for the criminal procedure act section 74, the director of public prosecutions believes there is new evidence of the weight of the case, ” says politiadvokat Per Thomas Omholt in the South-East police district.

Charged

Dagmammaen is now re-indicted in the case. The police want to interrogate her again, but she and her defense have not desired to provide a new explanation before she gets access to new etterforskningsdokumenter.

– It has been a period now where we have held the documents back for the defender and the defendant. At one time or another, we must consider whether we should finalize the case without new questioning of her, or whether we should give them access. The decision get we to take pretty soon, ” says Omholt to the VG.

Since access is so far not given want the police not to give information about what new evidence exists in the case.

What I can say is that time has helped the matter. It’s about new research, without that I will go into detail on it, ” says Omholt.

the Family says that neither they have received any special information about the new evidence in the case.

Lawyer: – Willing to interrogation

Dagmammanes lawyer, Thomas Randby, says to VG that his client had always been willing to explain herself, but she has requested that he, as her attorney, shall be present at the interrogation.

I said me willing to. But then it is so that they advokatetiske the rules, as I am subject to, saying that I should have access to the file before I assist during the interrogation. This is the police informed several times, both orally and in writing. I have requested access to the new documents, but not received it, ” says Randsby.

He knows not, therefore, when the interrogation will take place.

as of now, they have put themselves on a line where they are not willing to disclose the documents to me.

According to his lawyer claims it charged the woman still innocent.

the Case was thoroughly investigated from 2006 to 2008, and the case was then dismissed. Dagmammaen has all the time held by that she has not done anything wrong with Martine, ” says the lawyer.

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment