If Spotify.
war of words between Apple and Spotify continues. This time it’s Apple that responds to allegations that they are actively trying to sabotage your streaming service.
Apple vs. Spotify
It is already known that Apple sniffs the Tidal while Spotify claims that Apple refuses to publish a new version in the App Store without option of in-app purchases.
Apple requires Spotify use their payment solution app, and that’s exactly what Apple has responded Spotify; that flow Swedes must follow the same rules as all the other developers.
– Yanking around
“ We find it worrying that you request exemption from rules that apply to all developers, and that you publicly spreading rumors and half-truths about our service , “wrote Apple’s chief attorney Bruce Sewell to Spotify in a letter revealed by BuzzFeed.
Sewell claims that it is completely unfounded for Spotify to claim that Apple violates competition law and that Apple “will be glad if we added instantly to approve their app as soon as you deliver something that is according to App Store rules.”
Apple says that Spotify tries to remove its in-app purchase for the benefit of its own registration process to “sneak around Apple’s in-app purchase rules.”
“We did not change our behavior or rules when we introduced our own flow service or when Spotify was a competitor. Ironically, it is now Spotify who want things to be different by requesting discrimination from Apple, “shoot Sewell into the war of words.
Suddenly Spotify really competition
We have a feeling that Spotify fear Apple Music more than they did at the start.
Although Spotify is greatest, Apple Music shot up to 15 million paying customers since its launch in summer last year, while Spotify has at least 25 million paying per current summer since its launch 10 years ago.
Source:
BuzzFeed
No comments:
Post a Comment