Qualcomm turns back hard against Apple’s milliardsøksmål – ITavisen.en

Believe the charges are baseless and look forward to oppdagelsesperioden.

yesterday, it became known that Apple sues Qualcomm for a billion dollars, right after that the Korean authorities imposed the company a fine of 854 million dollars for unfair patentlisensiering.

Apple claims that that “Qualcomm has taken the paid for technology that doesn’t have anything to do with the company,” and that they have held back nearly $ 1 billion in payments from Apple “as an attack on Apple for having talked with etterforskningsorganisasjonene who are investigating them.”

“Baseless claims”
Now answer the Qualcomm Apple in a short statement on their web site, where they among other things, says that Apple’s claims are groundless and that they look forward to oppdagelsesperioden where they are by the common law get access to Apple’s methods.

– While we are still in the process of investigating the complaint in detail, it is very clear that Apple’s claims are groundless, said the utttalelsen from the vice president and a business lawyer Don Rosenberg continues:

“Feilkaraktiserer agreements”
– Apple has intentionally feilkarakterisert agreements and negotiations, as well as the size and value of the technology we have invented, contributed by and shared with the manufacturers of the mobile devices through the licensing program our.

Furthermore, believes Qualcomm is that Apple has tried to use the investigation of Qualcomm from the Korean government in order to damage the company.

Has resisted Qualcomm
– Apple has actively encouraged the regulatory attack on qualcomm’s business in different areas around the world, which is reflected in the recent decision from the KFTC (Korean competition authorities) and a complaint with the FTC (u.s. competition authorities), misrepresent facts and withhold essential information.

– We welcome the opportunity to bring these baseless allegations heard in court where we will have the opportunity for full discovery of Apple’s methods, and a robust examination of the case’s merits, ” says Rosenberg.

Sources
Qualcomm
by 9to5mac